Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine
Write a review
    Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine
    (4 reviews)
    Write a review
    Write a review

    Company Reviews

    Working at Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine

    2.34 ratings in total
    5
    0
    4
    0
    3
    1
    2
    3
    1
    0
    75%
    Rate salary as high or average
    0%
    Employees recommend this employer to friends
    Work/Life balance
    2.8(4 ratings)
    Career development
    2.0(4 ratings)
    Benefits & perks
    2.0(4 ratings)
    Management
    2.0(4 ratings)
    Working environment
    3.0(4 ratings)
    Ratings for Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine are shared as-is from employees in line with our community guidelines

    Reviews

    Showing 4 reviews sorted by most recent
    Sort by
    most recent
    2.0
    Research Fellow
    Apr 2022
    3 to 4 years in the role, former employee
    Not Recommended For Long Term Career
    The good thingsNew institute, nice workspaces, young vibes, generally nice co-workers.
    The challengesLow salary (way lower than market rates) upon transition from PhD student to postdoc. Increments and bonuses are terrible. Bad HR team. No sign of career progression. Too much workload, management is lacking empathy and not providing good work-life balance.
    4 people found this helpful
    3.0
    Research assistant
    Jun 2020
    1 to 2 years in the role, current employee
    average pay and no advancement
    The good thingsRelatively good employee welfare.
    The challengesPay and bonuses could be better. No AWS for research scheme
    1 person found this helpful
    2.0
    Research Assistant
    Jul 2019
    Singapore1 to 2 years in the role, current employee
    Good for research experience only
    The good thingsWith proper guidance and mentorship, you can gain valuable research experience if you intend to apply for grad school
    The challengesEnvironment can get extremely political and sometimes toxic. As a university that claims to pride itself in its research, it's unfortunate they do not value research staff in terms of benefits and bonuses. Career development is heavily limited. Some group leaders have limited research funding.
    5 people found this helpful
    2.0
    Senior executive
    May 2019
    1 to 2 years in the role, former employee
    Poor management
    The good thingsFantastic colleagues to work with but higher management is very political and do not value administrative and support staff
    The challengesMulticultural environment and fast paced
    3 people found this helpful
    Company Reviews published on our site are the views and opinions of their authors and do not represent the views and opinions of Jobstreet or its personnel. Jobstreet does not verify the truth or accuracy of any reviews and does not adopt or endorse any of the comments posted. Jobstreet posts reviews for what they are worth and for informational purposes only to assist candidates to find employment.