Professional Testing Services Pte Ltd
Write a review
    Professional Testing Services Pte Ltd
    (8 reviews)
    Write a review
    Write a review

    Company Reviews

    Working at Professional Testing Services Pte Ltd

    2.38 ratings in total
    5
    1
    4
    2
    3
    0
    2
    0
    1
    5
    76%
    Rate salary as high or average
    25%
    Employees recommend this employer to friends
    Work/Life balance
    3.3(7 ratings)
    Career development
    2.1(7 ratings)
    Benefits & perks
    2.1(7 ratings)
    Management
    2.1(7 ratings)
    Working environment
    3.3(7 ratings)
    Diversity & equal opportunity
    3.0(2 ratings)
    Ratings for Professional Testing Services Pte Ltd are shared as-is from employees in line with our community guidelines

    Reviews

    Showing 8 reviews sorted by most recent
    Sort by
    most recent
    1.0
    Sales Admin Assistant
    Jun 2025
    Joo Koon West Region2 to 3 years in the role, former employee
    Toxic Politics and Poor Management Overshadow Hard WorkMy overall experience was disappointing due to a very high level of internal politics that created a toxic work environment. Hardworking employees are often overlooked and unappreciated, while favoritism and connections seem to matter more than performance or dedication. The management is poor in terms of communication, leadership, and decision-making. Feedback is rarely considered, and there is no proper system to reward or recognize employees who consistently put in effort. It feels unfair and demotivating to work in an environment where merit is not acknowledged and politics overshadow performance.
    1 person found this helpful
    1.0
    Engineer
    Sep 2024
    Joo Koon West Region3 to 4 years in the role, former employee
    Not the best company to stay
    The good thingsThere are a lot of good colleagues
    The challengesThe current environment within the company appears to be heavily influenced by internal politics, leading to inconsistency in decision-making at the management level. This creates confusion among employees regarding their roles and responsibilities. Furthermore, management tends to centralize decision-making and often disregards diverse perspectives, limiting innovation and the free flow of ideas. There is a sense that employees’ opinions are undervalued or dismissed entirely, as management assumes they have the final authority, even at the expense of productive collaboration. Additionally, trust in leadership is eroded as they seem to be influenced or constrained by upper management decisions. Compensation practices also contribute to employee dissatisfaction. Despite strong financial performance in certain years, there is a perceived reluctance to reward employees appropriately. For example, bonuses are often reduced or withheld, with resources being allocated to investments like new machinery that may not be urgently needed. In some cases, certain employees do not receive bonuses at all, which can further impact morale and trust within the organization.
    1 person found this helpful
    4.0
    Corporate Function
    Sep 2024
    Kian Teck West Region
    Employees at PTS should feel fortunate and show their gratitude to Management by giving their best effort to the company. By excelling in their roles, they directly contribute to the business’s success, which in turn leads to greater bonuses. Remember, the grass isn’t always greener on the other side.
    The good thingsManagement consistently demonstrates empathy and takes care of employees, even during challenging business periods. They also maintain a pragmatic approach to their reward system.
    The challengesThe absence of effective business development and management enables poor performers to avoid delivering results while their excuses are accepted.
    1.0
    Executive assistant
    Jul 2023
    3 to 4 years in the role, former employee
    Ambitious Management but Lack of Management Knowledge
    The good thingsWithin the department, there is harmony. Under normal circumstances, the employees within the company are generally friendly. The company provides free Milo and also has a free parking lot and a gym room.
    The challengesThe management's unyielding nature is evident as they persistently adhere to their own ideas, disregarding valuable professional advice from others. Despite the existence of a performance review guideline crafted and published by management and HR, the evaluation process remains highly subjective, leaving employees with little to no recognition for their hard work. Even when employees consistently excel in their duties, negative reviews are still possible, depriving them of deserved bonuses and promotions. Furthermore, the management's decision-making appears arbitrary, burdening employees with ad-hoc tasks unrelated to their primary job responsibilities. This not only demands excellence in their core roles but also creates pressure to perform well in these additional tasks to secure year-end bonuses and advancement opportunities. The lack of transparent criteria for assessing employees' efforts and the unpredictable nature of additional responsibilities foster an atmosphere of uncertainty and discontent within the company. Adding to the challenges, the introduction of the Interpersonal Development Program (IDP) seems to be a management strategy aimed at negatively influencing employee year-end performance evaluations. Employees are required to excel in the IDP tasks, as they hold significant weight in the year-end performance review process. This raises concerns about the fairness and objectivity of the evaluation system, as the IDP tasks may overshadow the employees' true achievements and contributions. In light of these issues, it's essential for the management to create a more transparent and balanced evaluation system that recognizes employees' accomplishments fairly and encourages professional growth without burdening them with unrelated tasks. A collaborative and supportive work environment will lead to a more motivated and engaged workforce, ultimately benefiting both the employees and the company as a whole.
    1 person found this helpful
    1.0
    Sales
    Jun 2023
    Singapore1 to 2 years in the role, former employee
    poor management and lack of transparency
    The good thingswork life balance, good Colleagues
    The challengesDoing the daily job haphazardly or perfectly has no value. Management prefers staff to perform various ad hoc duties. Ad hoc tasks are a way to add value. There is a lack of transparency and poor management.
    2 people found this helpful
    1.0
    Technician
    Nov 2022
    1 to 2 years in the role, former employee
    enter at your own risk
    The good thingsnothing good to say at all
    The challengesmanagement， colleague， salary， working environment， and heavy workload if you like to work in stressful and challenging company please apply
    5 people found this helpful
    5.0
    Assistant Test Coordinator
    Oct 2018
    Less than 1 year in the role, current employee
    ASSITANT TEST COORDINATOR
    The good thingsFriendly environment. Proper guidance
    The challengesExtra willing to do attitude
    1 person found this helpful
    4.0
    Assistant Test Engineer
    May 2018
    Friendly environment but a passive culture
    The good thingsFriendly colleagues who are helpful and willing to guide and pass on their skills. Little hierarchy barrier which meant it was easy to raise concerns or ideas to be implemented.
    The challengesPassive culture and lack of recognition leading to employees lacking motivation to go the extra mile to perform tasks beyond their job scope.
    2 people found this helpful
    Company Reviews published on our site are the views and opinions of their authors and do not represent the views and opinions of Jobstreet or its personnel. Jobstreet does not verify the truth or accuracy of any reviews and does not adopt or endorse any of the comments posted. Jobstreet posts reviews for what they are worth and for informational purposes only to assist candidates to find employment.